Tour enough mid-century homes in the Movie Colony or Old Las Palmas this year and you will eventually hit the same line in a disclosure packet: Class 1 Historic Site. Most buyers read it two ways. Either it sounds like a bonus, something akin to a landmark plaque and a property tax break, or it sounds like a warning label, a sign that the city will make you fight for every window you want to replace. Neither read is complete, and the gap between them is where the real decision lives.
The city's own numbers tell a more specific story. As of March 2026, Palm Springs had 524 properties eligible for a Mills Act contract, the program that trades a reduction in property taxes for a commitment to maintain and restore a historic home. Only 177 of them had one. Fourteen more were in process. The city processes roughly 12 new applications a year, according to Planning Director Chris Hadwin's remarks to the Palm Springs City Council that same month. That means the large majority of homeowners who qualify for a real, recurring tax discount are choosing not to take it. That choice is the thesis of this post: designation is not free money that owners are missing out on by accident. It is a trade most of them have already priced out, and buyers should price it the same way before they fall for a home based on its landmark status alone.
Palm Springs runs a two-tier system for historic homes. A Class 1 resource is the city's landmark tier, reserved for sites with what the municipal code calls exceptional historical significance. Class 2 covers properties of historic merit that do not clear the Class 1 bar but still warrant protection. Both classes are designated by City Council resolution after a review by the seven-member Historic Site Preservation Board, and both carry the same practical requirement once the designation is on the books: any exterior demolition or alteration needs a Certificate of Appropriateness before a building or zoning permit can even be issued.
That requirement is not limited to additions or major remodels. The city's own guidance notes that changes not requiring a standard building permit, including paint color, hardscape, and most landscaping, still need sign-off if the property sits in a historic district. Repainting in the same historic color is exempt. Repainting in a different one is not.
Here is where the Mills Act math gets interesting. Using the city's March 2026 median annual property tax assessment of $4,250 as a baseline, Hadwin estimated that a typical Mills Act rebate runs 40 to 70 percent of that bill, or roughly $1,700 to $3,000 a year. Across the 12 or so contracts the city grants annually, that adds up to a $20,000 to $35,000 annual reduction in the city's property tax base, with a projected 10-year cumulative impact between $300,000 and $500,000 including contracts already on the books.
That is real, recurring money for an owner willing to sign a 10-year maintenance commitment. And yet two out of every three eligible owners have not signed one. If the incentive were as simple as free savings for no cost, uptake would be far closer to universal. It is not, which means the cost side of the ledger is doing more work than most buyers assume.
The cost is not the paperwork of applying. It is what happens after. Once a home carries Class 1 or Class 2 status, or sits as a contributing resource inside a historic district, every exterior change runs through the Historic Preservation Officer and, for anything significant, the full Historic Site Preservation Board. An application for a Certificate of Appropriateness has to include photographs of every exterior elevation affected, material samples or manufacturer specifications for anything being installed, and a case for why the change does not impair the features that earned the home its designation in the first place. The board can approve, modify, or deny.
For an owner who has no plans to touch the exterior, this is a non-issue and the Mills Act is close to free money. For an owner who wants to swap out original jalousie windows, extend a primary suite, or redo a desert landscape plan, the review process adds time, design constraints, and a real chance of being told no. A tax savings of two or three thousand dollars a year stops looking attractive next to a renovation project that might get rejected or delayed by a board meeting schedule. The Historic Site Preservation Board typically meets once a month, and that alone can push a straightforward remodel timeline out by weeks.
This is the part that surprises buyers who assume mid-century modern and historically protected are the same thing in Palm Springs. They are not, and the gap between the two is large. Neighborhoods built by Alexander Construction, including the several hundred homes that make up Racquet Club Estates, are almost entirely undesignated. The Robert Alexander Residence, known as the House of Tomorrow at 1350 Ladera Circle, is one of the few homes from that builder to carry the city's historic protections at all.
Contrast that with the specific, named homes that have gone through the full process. Cary Grant's former residence at 928 North Avenida Palmas, known as Las Palomas, received Class 1 designation in 2011. The Kramer Residence on East Granvia Valmonte, a 1963 New Formalism design by architect James McNaughton, was designated in 2019. The Abernathy Residence on North Phillips Road, a 1962 William Cody design with post-and-beam construction and floor-to-ceiling glass, was designated in 2013 and drew Wall Street Journal coverage of its restoration and sale in 2024. These are landmark-caliber properties with documented architectural pedigree, not the typical resale listing in Vista Las Palmas or Twin Palms. Most mid-century homes in Palm Springs, including plenty of architecturally faithful ones, carry no historic status whatsoever, which means most buyers touring this market will never actually face the Certificate of Appropriateness question. The ones who do are usually looking at a specific tier of home, and should treat the designation as a distinct variable in the deal, not a background fact.
If a home you are considering carries Class 1 or Class 2 status, or sits inside a historic district as a contributing resource, a few questions are worth answering before you get attached to a renovation plan:
Does a Mills Act contract transfer when the home sells? Yes. The contract renews automatically and stays attached to the property through a sale, which is why it is worth confirming whether one already exists before you make an offer.
Can I repaint a historically designated home without approval? Only if the new color matches what already exists or existed historically. A color change still requires a Certificate of Appropriateness.
Is every mid-century home in Old Las Palmas or the Movie Colony historically designated? No. Designation happens one property at a time through a City Council resolution, and the large majority of mid-century homes across Palm Springs, including many in these neighborhoods, carry no historic status at all.
If you are weighing a Class 1 or Class 2 property against an undesignated one, the renovation math matters as much as the architecture. Douglas Turold has spent enough time on both sides of that trade, preparing historic homes for sale and helping buyers understand what they are actually taking on, to walk through the specifics with you before you write an offer. Book a consultation and bring the address. We can pull the designation history together before you tour it again.